
substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305
Preview meta tags from the substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Michael Goldstein on Substack
As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.
Bing
Michael Goldstein on Substack
As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.
DuckDuckGo

Michael Goldstein on Substack
As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.
General Meta Tags
14- titleMichael Goldstein on Substack: "As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which argumen…"
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
9- og:urlhttps://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305
- og:typearticle
- og:titleMichael Goldstein on Substack
- og:descriptionAs I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-11071305%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data10
- twitter:label2Replies
- twitter:data20
- twitter:titleMichael Goldstein on Substack
Link Tags
37- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
- canonicalhttps://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305
- iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
- manifest/manifest.json
- preconnecthttps://substackcdn.com
Links
5- https://bitstein.substack.com
- https://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305?
- https://substack.com/@bitstein?
- https://substack.com/@bitstein?utm_source=substack-feed-item
- https://substack.com/home?