substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305

Preview meta tags from the substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305

Michael Goldstein on Substack

As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.



Bing

Michael Goldstein on Substack

https://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305

As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.



DuckDuckGo

https://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305

Michael Goldstein on Substack

As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.

  • General Meta Tags

    14
    • title
      Michael Goldstein on Substack: "As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which argumen…"
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Michael Goldstein on Substack
    • og:description
      As I said at the beginning, the term itself is pretty nebulous, so there doesn't exist an accepted clear definition. I think you make a good case as to why the arguments ought to be more formalized, so we can see what assumptions are needed to make what arguments, which arguments are stronger or weaker than we thought, etc. Giacomo Zucco had a long presentation trying to do that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRH_HepKUZA I'll keep that in mind as I write here.
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-11071305%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
    • twitter:data2
      0
    • twitter:title
      Michael Goldstein on Substack
  • Link Tags

    37
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://substack.com/@bitstein/note/c-11071305
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • manifest
      /manifest.json
    • preconnect
      https://substackcdn.com

Links

5