shotscarecrow.substack.com/p/ai-is-no-threat-to-poetry-weve-already/comment/55013527

Preview meta tags from the shotscarecrow.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://shotscarecrow.substack.com/p/ai-is-no-threat-to-poetry-weve-already/comment/55013527

[email protected] on Stray Bulletin

In response to the question you began with, I guess AI might make some (not necessarily bad) difference, if it becomes one of the tools poets habitually use to arrive at whatever version of their poem they prefer. I find that idea interesting, albeit not personally appealing. When I write formal, rhyming work, I often turn to Rhymezone to generate options for me that I might not otherwise have thought of. This is a form of AI I think, if only very basic. But it's a tool. And one thing beyond debate (I fondly think) is that poets of different ages have different tools at their disposal. I rather like this idea. There might equally be AI edit tools that would allow poets to see certain flaws of, say, repetition, or grammar. An edit tool could throw up suggestions for increasing assonance or alliteration or any of the rhetorical tricks. But I agree with your general tenet. AI is not a threat. No more than the rest of the multitude.



Bing

[email protected] on Stray Bulletin

https://shotscarecrow.substack.com/p/ai-is-no-threat-to-poetry-weve-already/comment/55013527

In response to the question you began with, I guess AI might make some (not necessarily bad) difference, if it becomes one of the tools poets habitually use to arrive at whatever version of their poem they prefer. I find that idea interesting, albeit not personally appealing. When I write formal, rhyming work, I often turn to Rhymezone to generate options for me that I might not otherwise have thought of. This is a form of AI I think, if only very basic. But it's a tool. And one thing beyond debate (I fondly think) is that poets of different ages have different tools at their disposal. I rather like this idea. There might equally be AI edit tools that would allow poets to see certain flaws of, say, repetition, or grammar. An edit tool could throw up suggestions for increasing assonance or alliteration or any of the rhetorical tricks. But I agree with your general tenet. AI is not a threat. No more than the rest of the multitude.



DuckDuckGo

https://shotscarecrow.substack.com/p/ai-is-no-threat-to-poetry-weve-already/comment/55013527

[email protected] on Stray Bulletin

In response to the question you began with, I guess AI might make some (not necessarily bad) difference, if it becomes one of the tools poets habitually use to arrive at whatever version of their poem they prefer. I find that idea interesting, albeit not personally appealing. When I write formal, rhyming work, I often turn to Rhymezone to generate options for me that I might not otherwise have thought of. This is a form of AI I think, if only very basic. But it's a tool. And one thing beyond debate (I fondly think) is that poets of different ages have different tools at their disposal. I rather like this idea. There might equally be AI edit tools that would allow poets to see certain flaws of, say, repetition, or grammar. An edit tool could throw up suggestions for increasing assonance or alliteration or any of the rhetorical tricks. But I agree with your general tenet. AI is not a threat. No more than the rest of the multitude.

  • General Meta Tags

    16
    • title
      Comments - AI is no threat to poetry; we’ve already got it licked
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://shotscarecrow.substack.com/p/ai-is-no-threat-to-poetry-weve-already/comment/55013527
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      [email protected] on Stray Bulletin
    • og:description
      In response to the question you began with, I guess AI might make some (not necessarily bad) difference, if it becomes one of the tools poets habitually use to arrive at whatever version of their poem they prefer. I find that idea interesting, albeit not personally appealing. When I write formal, rhyming work, I often turn to Rhymezone to generate options for me that I might not otherwise have thought of. This is a form of AI I think, if only very basic. But it's a tool. And one thing beyond debate (I fondly think) is that poets of different ages have different tools at their disposal. I rather like this idea. There might equally be AI edit tools that would allow poets to see certain flaws of, say, repetition, or grammar. An edit tool could throw up suggestions for increasing assonance or alliteration or any of the rhetorical tricks. But I agree with your general tenet. AI is not a threat. No more than the rest of the multitude.
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-55013527%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
    • twitter:data2
      0
    • twitter:title
      [email protected] on Stray Bulletin
  • Link Tags

    41
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://shotscarecrow.substack.com/p/ai-is-no-threat-to-poetry-weve-already/comment/55013527
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • preconnect
      https://substackcdn.com

Links

14