philkoopman.substack.com/p/a-practical-list-of-embodied-ai-safety-497/comment/121218485

Preview meta tags from the philkoopman.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

3

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://philkoopman.substack.com/p/a-practical-list-of-embodied-ai-safety-497/comment/121218485

F Perkins on Autonomous System Safety by Phil Koopman

Thanks. Sometimes overlooked is that increased reliance on AI/ML and the opacity it causes means diminished reliance on the traditional paradigm of cause and effect. Physical mechanisms and most software can be validated by proof of bidirectional relationships between requirements and outputs. AI/ ML cannot. Instead, validation of AI/ML relies on statistical cross-correlation analysis of inputs vs. results. Neither industry nor government standards exist for reliability and statistical confidence of safety-critical capabilities of AVs reliant on AI/ML technology. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. Industry claims that abandoning reliance on the simple notion of ‘cause and effect’ for validation of safety-critical AV functions in favor of murky AI/ML aspirations is in the best interests of public safety. They have not.



Bing

F Perkins on Autonomous System Safety by Phil Koopman

https://philkoopman.substack.com/p/a-practical-list-of-embodied-ai-safety-497/comment/121218485

Thanks. Sometimes overlooked is that increased reliance on AI/ML and the opacity it causes means diminished reliance on the traditional paradigm of cause and effect. Physical mechanisms and most software can be validated by proof of bidirectional relationships between requirements and outputs. AI/ ML cannot. Instead, validation of AI/ML relies on statistical cross-correlation analysis of inputs vs. results. Neither industry nor government standards exist for reliability and statistical confidence of safety-critical capabilities of AVs reliant on AI/ML technology. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. Industry claims that abandoning reliance on the simple notion of ‘cause and effect’ for validation of safety-critical AV functions in favor of murky AI/ML aspirations is in the best interests of public safety. They have not.



DuckDuckGo

https://philkoopman.substack.com/p/a-practical-list-of-embodied-ai-safety-497/comment/121218485

F Perkins on Autonomous System Safety by Phil Koopman

Thanks. Sometimes overlooked is that increased reliance on AI/ML and the opacity it causes means diminished reliance on the traditional paradigm of cause and effect. Physical mechanisms and most software can be validated by proof of bidirectional relationships between requirements and outputs. AI/ ML cannot. Instead, validation of AI/ML relies on statistical cross-correlation analysis of inputs vs. results. Neither industry nor government standards exist for reliability and statistical confidence of safety-critical capabilities of AVs reliant on AI/ML technology. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. Industry claims that abandoning reliance on the simple notion of ‘cause and effect’ for validation of safety-critical AV functions in favor of murky AI/ML aspirations is in the best interests of public safety. They have not.

  • General Meta Tags

    18
    • title
      Comments - A practical list of embodied AI safety concerns: Evading transparency (Part 2)
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://philkoopman.substack.com/p/a-practical-list-of-embodied-ai-safety-497/comment/121218485
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      F Perkins on Autonomous System Safety by Phil Koopman
    • og:description
      Thanks. Sometimes overlooked is that increased reliance on AI/ML and the opacity it causes means diminished reliance on the traditional paradigm of cause and effect. Physical mechanisms and most software can be validated by proof of bidirectional relationships between requirements and outputs. AI/ ML cannot. Instead, validation of AI/ML relies on statistical cross-correlation analysis of inputs vs. results. Neither industry nor government standards exist for reliability and statistical confidence of safety-critical capabilities of AVs reliant on AI/ML technology. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. Industry claims that abandoning reliance on the simple notion of ‘cause and effect’ for validation of safety-critical AV functions in favor of murky AI/ML aspirations is in the best interests of public safety. They have not.
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-121218485%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
    • twitter:data2
      1
    • twitter:title
      F Perkins on Autonomous System Safety by Phil Koopman
  • Link Tags

    50
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fac439826-cee4-488b-9bb1-7a163b31b78e%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fac439826-cee4-488b-9bb1-7a163b31b78e%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fac439826-cee4-488b-9bb1-7a163b31b78e%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fac439826-cee4-488b-9bb1-7a163b31b78e%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png

Links

18