metatron.substack.com/p/a-critical-reassessment-of-the-anthropogenic/comment/102729886
Preview meta tags from the metatron.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Dr Mike Yeadon on Dead Man Talking
Very good. I’m not surprised by this result. It often surprises people to learn that, for all the claims of “the science is settled”, that there is plenty of published information on the basis of which one can confidently reject the claim or hypothesis that release of CO2 by human activity is driving catastrophic climate change. The classical example is the record of atmospheric CO2 and proxies for temperature that is stored in polar ice cores. This has been studied by several independent research groups. Temperature changes always PRECEEDED changes in CO2. CO2 therefore CANNOT drive temperature changes. It’s all lies. I go much further than that. It took me some years to realise that not only is there no link between our release of CO2 and mean surface temperature, but that even the claim that the world has warmed around 3 degrees Fahrenheit since pre-industrial times is fakery, accomplished by what’s called “the urban heat island effect”. Weather monitoring stations have mostly gradually changed from rural to suburban or from suburban to metropolitan (through construction of many buildings). If the record of only stations which haven’t become surrounded by new buildings was used, there’s been no consistent change in temperature over 100+ years. The entire narrative is lies. It’s not a mistake but a long lives and well financed fraud. Just as is the fake discipline called “virology”. Same financiers, same organisations and same objectives.
Bing
Dr Mike Yeadon on Dead Man Talking
Very good. I’m not surprised by this result. It often surprises people to learn that, for all the claims of “the science is settled”, that there is plenty of published information on the basis of which one can confidently reject the claim or hypothesis that release of CO2 by human activity is driving catastrophic climate change. The classical example is the record of atmospheric CO2 and proxies for temperature that is stored in polar ice cores. This has been studied by several independent research groups. Temperature changes always PRECEEDED changes in CO2. CO2 therefore CANNOT drive temperature changes. It’s all lies. I go much further than that. It took me some years to realise that not only is there no link between our release of CO2 and mean surface temperature, but that even the claim that the world has warmed around 3 degrees Fahrenheit since pre-industrial times is fakery, accomplished by what’s called “the urban heat island effect”. Weather monitoring stations have mostly gradually changed from rural to suburban or from suburban to metropolitan (through construction of many buildings). If the record of only stations which haven’t become surrounded by new buildings was used, there’s been no consistent change in temperature over 100+ years. The entire narrative is lies. It’s not a mistake but a long lives and well financed fraud. Just as is the fake discipline called “virology”. Same financiers, same organisations and same objectives.
DuckDuckGo
Dr Mike Yeadon on Dead Man Talking
Very good. I’m not surprised by this result. It often surprises people to learn that, for all the claims of “the science is settled”, that there is plenty of published information on the basis of which one can confidently reject the claim or hypothesis that release of CO2 by human activity is driving catastrophic climate change. The classical example is the record of atmospheric CO2 and proxies for temperature that is stored in polar ice cores. This has been studied by several independent research groups. Temperature changes always PRECEEDED changes in CO2. CO2 therefore CANNOT drive temperature changes. It’s all lies. I go much further than that. It took me some years to realise that not only is there no link between our release of CO2 and mean surface temperature, but that even the claim that the world has warmed around 3 degrees Fahrenheit since pre-industrial times is fakery, accomplished by what’s called “the urban heat island effect”. Weather monitoring stations have mostly gradually changed from rural to suburban or from suburban to metropolitan (through construction of many buildings). If the record of only stations which haven’t become surrounded by new buildings was used, there’s been no consistent change in temperature over 100+ years. The entire narrative is lies. It’s not a mistake but a long lives and well financed fraud. Just as is the fake discipline called “virology”. Same financiers, same organisations and same objectives.
General Meta Tags
18- titleComments - A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
9- og:urlhttps://metatron.substack.com/p/a-critical-reassessment-of-the-anthropogenic/comment/102729886
- og:typearticle
- og:titleDr Mike Yeadon on Dead Man Talking
- og:descriptionVery good. I’m not surprised by this result. It often surprises people to learn that, for all the claims of “the science is settled”, that there is plenty of published information on the basis of which one can confidently reject the claim or hypothesis that release of CO2 by human activity is driving catastrophic climate change. The classical example is the record of atmospheric CO2 and proxies for temperature that is stored in polar ice cores. This has been studied by several independent research groups. Temperature changes always PRECEEDED changes in CO2. CO2 therefore CANNOT drive temperature changes. It’s all lies. I go much further than that. It took me some years to realise that not only is there no link between our release of CO2 and mean surface temperature, but that even the claim that the world has warmed around 3 degrees Fahrenheit since pre-industrial times is fakery, accomplished by what’s called “the urban heat island effect”. Weather monitoring stations have mostly gradually changed from rural to suburban or from suburban to metropolitan (through construction of many buildings). If the record of only stations which haven’t become surrounded by new buildings was used, there’s been no consistent change in temperature over 100+ years. The entire narrative is lies. It’s not a mistake but a long lives and well financed fraud. Just as is the fake discipline called “virology”. Same financiers, same organisations and same objectives.
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-102729886%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data128
- twitter:label2Replies
- twitter:data23
- twitter:titleDr Mike Yeadon on Dead Man Talking
Link Tags
54- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0d4ee908-0535-41a2-8607-2c0502e40477%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0d4ee908-0535-41a2-8607-2c0502e40477%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0d4ee908-0535-41a2-8607-2c0502e40477%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0d4ee908-0535-41a2-8607-2c0502e40477%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
32- https://metatron.substack.com
- https://metatron.substack.com/p/a-critical-reassessment-of-the-anthropogenic/comment/102729886
- https://metatron.substack.com/p/a-critical-reassessment-of-the-anthropogenic/comment/102817341
- https://metatron.substack.com/p/a-critical-reassessment-of-the-anthropogenic/comment/102894140
- https://metatron.substack.com/p/a-critical-reassessment-of-the-anthropogenic/comment/102918965