math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_figure_how_many_significant_figures_a_number_has

Preview meta tags from the math.answers.com website.

Linked Hostnames

9

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_figure_how_many_significant_figures_a_number_has

How do you figure how many significant figures a number has? - Answers

Generally speaking, one can't have more significant figures in the answer to a mathematical equation than the least number of significant figures of all the values used to generate that equation. 6*6=40 6.0*6.0=36 For example: 1.1/2.3=0.478260869... But it doesn't make sense for the answer to have more significant figures than 2: 0.48. The point of significant figures is that the precision of the answer should reflect the precision of the factors that led to the answer. For example, suppose you were trying to measure the length of two pieces of string, with a ruler graduated down to millimeters. Lets say you wanted the sum of the length of the two strings. It would not make sense to express the sum in nanometers, because the precision of the measurements was in millimeter level. It would also be incorrect to express the sum in centimeters even if the result was a number with one or more trailing zeros, the measurements were accurate to 1 millimeter. 374mm + 626mm = 1000mm NOT 1 meter nor 100cm (but 1.000 meter, or 100.0cm)



Bing

How do you figure how many significant figures a number has? - Answers

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_figure_how_many_significant_figures_a_number_has

Generally speaking, one can't have more significant figures in the answer to a mathematical equation than the least number of significant figures of all the values used to generate that equation. 6*6=40 6.0*6.0=36 For example: 1.1/2.3=0.478260869... But it doesn't make sense for the answer to have more significant figures than 2: 0.48. The point of significant figures is that the precision of the answer should reflect the precision of the factors that led to the answer. For example, suppose you were trying to measure the length of two pieces of string, with a ruler graduated down to millimeters. Lets say you wanted the sum of the length of the two strings. It would not make sense to express the sum in nanometers, because the precision of the measurements was in millimeter level. It would also be incorrect to express the sum in centimeters even if the result was a number with one or more trailing zeros, the measurements were accurate to 1 millimeter. 374mm + 626mm = 1000mm NOT 1 meter nor 100cm (but 1.000 meter, or 100.0cm)



DuckDuckGo

https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_figure_how_many_significant_figures_a_number_has

How do you figure how many significant figures a number has? - Answers

Generally speaking, one can't have more significant figures in the answer to a mathematical equation than the least number of significant figures of all the values used to generate that equation. 6*6=40 6.0*6.0=36 For example: 1.1/2.3=0.478260869... But it doesn't make sense for the answer to have more significant figures than 2: 0.48. The point of significant figures is that the precision of the answer should reflect the precision of the factors that led to the answer. For example, suppose you were trying to measure the length of two pieces of string, with a ruler graduated down to millimeters. Lets say you wanted the sum of the length of the two strings. It would not make sense to express the sum in nanometers, because the precision of the measurements was in millimeter level. It would also be incorrect to express the sum in centimeters even if the result was a number with one or more trailing zeros, the measurements were accurate to 1 millimeter. 374mm + 626mm = 1000mm NOT 1 meter nor 100cm (but 1.000 meter, or 100.0cm)

  • General Meta Tags

    22
    • title
      How do you figure how many significant figures a number has? - Answers
    • charset
      utf-8
    • Content-Type
      text/html; charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      minimum-scale=1, initial-scale=1, width=device-width, shrink-to-fit=no
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:image
      https://st.answers.com/html_test_assets/Answers_Blue.jpeg
    • og:image:width
      900
    • og:image:height
      900
    • og:site_name
      Answers
    • og:description
      Generally speaking, one can't have more significant figures in the answer to a mathematical equation than the least number of significant figures of all the values used to generate that equation. 6*6=40 6.0*6.0=36 For example: 1.1/2.3=0.478260869... But it doesn't make sense for the answer to have more significant figures than 2: 0.48. The point of significant figures is that the precision of the answer should reflect the precision of the factors that led to the answer. For example, suppose you were trying to measure the length of two pieces of string, with a ruler graduated down to millimeters. Lets say you wanted the sum of the length of the two strings. It would not make sense to express the sum in nanometers, because the precision of the measurements was in millimeter level. It would also be incorrect to express the sum in centimeters even if the result was a number with one or more trailing zeros, the measurements were accurate to 1 millimeter. 374mm + 626mm = 1000mm NOT 1 meter nor 100cm (but 1.000 meter, or 100.0cm)
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    1
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
  • Link Tags

    16
    • alternate
      https://www.answers.com/feed.rss
    • apple-touch-icon
      /icons/180x180.png
    • canonical
      https://math.answers.com/math-and-arithmetic/How_do_you_figure_how_many_significant_figures_a_number_has
    • icon
      /favicon.svg
    • icon
      /icons/16x16.png

Links

58