aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134859

Preview meta tags from the aseq.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134859

Nava Whiteford on ASeq Newsletter

Thanks for your comment! Yes, I think there are more sensitive techniques than qPCR. In this context, I’m trying to evaluate sequencing as an alternative to qPCR for viral diagnostics. qPCR has been considered the “gold standard” here. Would be interesting to look at ddPCR too however, I think the limitations described in the first model hold here. But it would be interesting to think about this more.



Bing

Nava Whiteford on ASeq Newsletter

https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134859

Thanks for your comment! Yes, I think there are more sensitive techniques than qPCR. In this context, I’m trying to evaluate sequencing as an alternative to qPCR for viral diagnostics. qPCR has been considered the “gold standard” here. Would be interesting to look at ddPCR too however, I think the limitations described in the first model hold here. But it would be interesting to think about this more.



DuckDuckGo

https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134859

Nava Whiteford on ASeq Newsletter

Thanks for your comment! Yes, I think there are more sensitive techniques than qPCR. In this context, I’m trying to evaluate sequencing as an alternative to qPCR for viral diagnostics. qPCR has been considered the “gold standard” here. Would be interesting to look at ddPCR too however, I think the limitations described in the first model hold here. But it would be interesting to think about this more.

  • General Meta Tags

    17
    • title
      Comments - Modeling Sequencing Sensitivity
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title

  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://aseq.substack.com/p/modeling-sequencing-sensitivity/comment/12134859
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Nava Whiteford on ASeq Newsletter
    • og:description
      Thanks for your comment! Yes, I think there are more sensitive techniques than qPCR. In this context, I’m trying to evaluate sequencing as an alternative to qPCR for viral diagnostics. qPCR has been considered the “gold standard” here. Would be interesting to look at ddPCR too however, I think the limitations described in the first model hold here. But it would be interesting to think about this more.
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-12134859%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm

  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
    • twitter:data2
      0
    • twitter:title
      Nava Whiteford on ASeq Newsletter

  • Link Tags

    53
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F38a86f05-8e11-4d1a-9d0a-770935126320%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png

Links

14