aimeebyrd.substack.com/p/hyper-sexualization-why-cant-we-be/comment/122464103
Preview meta tags from the aimeebyrd.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
2Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Sandra Glahn on Byrd in Your Box
Amen. With a caveat: Second-wave feminism explored topics that included sexuality, but few second-wave feminist authors framed sex as an “evolutionary drive” (e.g., as a biologically hardwired behavior). Rather, second-wave feminists objected to the emphasis on men’s pleasure being centered in the sex act in a way that women’s pleasure was not. (One can see such male-centered focus in books by and for Christians, such as Ed Wheat’s *Intended for Pleasure*.) Second-wavers often emphasized social, political, and cultural factors shaping women’s sexuality rather than a purely biological or evolutionary explanation. In fact many second-wave feminists were even critical of biological determinism, seeing it as a tool used to justify patriarchy.
Bing
Sandra Glahn on Byrd in Your Box
Amen. With a caveat: Second-wave feminism explored topics that included sexuality, but few second-wave feminist authors framed sex as an “evolutionary drive” (e.g., as a biologically hardwired behavior). Rather, second-wave feminists objected to the emphasis on men’s pleasure being centered in the sex act in a way that women’s pleasure was not. (One can see such male-centered focus in books by and for Christians, such as Ed Wheat’s *Intended for Pleasure*.) Second-wavers often emphasized social, political, and cultural factors shaping women’s sexuality rather than a purely biological or evolutionary explanation. In fact many second-wave feminists were even critical of biological determinism, seeing it as a tool used to justify patriarchy.
DuckDuckGo
Sandra Glahn on Byrd in Your Box
Amen. With a caveat: Second-wave feminism explored topics that included sexuality, but few second-wave feminist authors framed sex as an “evolutionary drive” (e.g., as a biologically hardwired behavior). Rather, second-wave feminists objected to the emphasis on men’s pleasure being centered in the sex act in a way that women’s pleasure was not. (One can see such male-centered focus in books by and for Christians, such as Ed Wheat’s *Intended for Pleasure*.) Second-wavers often emphasized social, political, and cultural factors shaping women’s sexuality rather than a purely biological or evolutionary explanation. In fact many second-wave feminists were even critical of biological determinism, seeing it as a tool used to justify patriarchy.
General Meta Tags
17- titleComments - Hyper-sexualization: Why Can’t We Be Friends?
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
9- og:urlhttps://aimeebyrd.substack.com/p/hyper-sexualization-why-cant-we-be/comment/122464103
- og:typearticle
- og:titleSandra Glahn on Byrd in Your Box
- og:descriptionAmen. With a caveat: Second-wave feminism explored topics that included sexuality, but few second-wave feminist authors framed sex as an “evolutionary drive” (e.g., as a biologically hardwired behavior). Rather, second-wave feminists objected to the emphasis on men’s pleasure being centered in the sex act in a way that women’s pleasure was not. (One can see such male-centered focus in books by and for Christians, such as Ed Wheat’s *Intended for Pleasure*.) Second-wavers often emphasized social, political, and cultural factors shaping women’s sexuality rather than a purely biological or evolutionary explanation. In fact many second-wave feminists were even critical of biological determinism, seeing it as a tool used to justify patriarchy.
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_680,h_680,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fnote%2Fc-122464103%2Fpreview.jpeg%3Fsize%3Dsm
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data16
- twitter:label2Replies
- twitter:data21
- twitter:titleSandra Glahn on Byrd in Your Box
Link Tags
52- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fefb7f8e4-27da-456d-97b5-bf2319442ff7%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fefb7f8e4-27da-456d-97b5-bf2319442ff7%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fefb7f8e4-27da-456d-97b5-bf2319442ff7%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fefb7f8e4-27da-456d-97b5-bf2319442ff7%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
17- https://aimeebyrd.substack.com
- https://aimeebyrd.substack.com/p/hyper-sexualization-why-cant-we-be/comment/122464103
- https://aimeebyrd.substack.com/p/hyper-sexualization-why-cant-we-be/comment/122468912
- https://aimeebyrd.substack.com/p/hyper-sexualization-why-cant-we-be/comments#comment-122464103
- https://substack.com