www.hackaday.io/project/198914-not-an-ethernet-transceiver

Preview meta tags from the www.hackaday.io website.

Linked Hostnames

13

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://www.hackaday.io/project/198914-not-an-ethernet-transceiver

Not an Ethernet Transceiver

custom(izable) circuit for sending some megabytes over differential pairs.



Bing

Not an Ethernet Transceiver

https://www.hackaday.io/project/198914-not-an-ethernet-transceiver

custom(izable) circuit for sending some megabytes over differential pairs.



DuckDuckGo

https://www.hackaday.io/project/198914-not-an-ethernet-transceiver

Not an Ethernet Transceiver

custom(izable) circuit for sending some megabytes over differential pairs.

  • General Meta Tags

    5
    • title
      Not an Ethernet Transceiver | Hackaday.io
    • charset
      utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
    • theme-color
      #333333
    • description
      custom(izable) circuit for sending some megabytes over differential pairs.
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    5
    • og:type
      website
    • og:title
      Not an Ethernet Transceiver
    • og:url
      https://hackaday.io/project/198914-not-an-ethernet-transceiver
    • og:image
      https://cdn.hackaday.io/images/resize/600x600/3242421745975679164.png
    • og:description
      This is not Ethernet, though (initially) quite inspired by Fast Ethernet (100Base-TX) and using the same medium (RJ45/CAT5 or better) and magnetics. Or just plain matched impedance diffpair, I will not judge. It should provide mostly equivalent performance but does not require all the IEEE 802.3xyz hoop-jumping: it could even be one-way (just a single data pair plus clock pair) and can be implemented in a cheap FPGA (Ice45 ? A3P250?), TinyTapeout or even a Pi pico or something. As it progresses, it looks more like a poor man's Fibre Channel over Cat5... Applications are wherever you need to deport devices up to a dozen of meters with standard cabling (or circuit traces), such as sensors, sound, pictures... at a few megabytes per second. So far (May 2025) it's evolving towards a MAC+PHY pair, yet more digital logic and protocols than serious analog and signal processing... yet.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    5
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:site
      @hackadayio
    • twitter:title
      Not an Ethernet Transceiver
    • twitter:image
      https://cdn.hackaday.io/images/resize/600x600/3242421745975679164.png
    • twitter:description
      This is not Ethernet, though (initially) quite inspired by Fast Ethernet (100Base-TX) and using the same medium (RJ45/CAT5 or better) and magnetics. Or just plain matched impedance diffpair, I will not judge. It should provide mostly equivalent performance but does not require all the IEEE 802.3xyz hoop-jumping: it could even be one-way (just a single data pair plus clock pair) and can be implemented in a cheap FPGA (Ice45 ? A3P250?), TinyTapeout or even a Pi pico or something. As it progresses, it looks more like a poor man's Fibre Channel over Cat5... Applications are wherever you need to deport devices up to a dozen of meters with standard cabling (or circuit traces), such as sensors, sound, pictures... at a few megabytes per second. So far (May 2025) it's evolving towards a MAC+PHY pair, yet more digital logic and protocols than serious analog and signal processing... yet.
  • Link Tags

    3
    • apple-touch-icon-precomposed
      /apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://hackaday.io/project/198914-not-an-ethernet-transceiver
    • stylesheet
      //cdn.hackaday.io/css/style.css?version=1.1.1

Emails

1

Links

203