kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/02/06/kerning-and-kerning-in-a-widening-gyre

Preview meta tags from the kieranhealy.org website.

Linked Hostnames

13

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/02/06/kerning-and-kerning-in-a-widening-gyre

Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre

This post summarizes an extended period of deep annoyance. I have tried to solve the problem it describes more than once before and not quite done it. This has, in fact, happened again. I have still not satisfactorily solved the problem. But this time I know why I can’t solve it in a civilized manner. My goal is simple, and reasonable. I want to produce more or less identical plots in both PNG and PDF formats. PNG is a raster format. PDF is a vector format and also the Devil Incarnate. Sometimes you want one format, sometimes the other. Raster formats color in pixels on a grid of some fixed resolution. They are efficient when you need to plot a lot of elements, but you can’t zoom in on them without loss. When you make one, any as it were “structural” information about plot elements is lost. A line or a shape no longer exists as an editable line or shape. It’s just pixels. Vector formats can be easily resized up or down without loss of fidelity and keep more of the structural information used to make the plot to begin with. Lines and shapes remain lines and shapes. But vector formats get big real fast when you have a lot of objects to show, because each one is drawn separately. Also they are the Devil Incarnate. Especially when it comes to one special subset of lines and shapes: fonts.



Bing

Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre

https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/02/06/kerning-and-kerning-in-a-widening-gyre

This post summarizes an extended period of deep annoyance. I have tried to solve the problem it describes more than once before and not quite done it. This has, in fact, happened again. I have still not satisfactorily solved the problem. But this time I know why I can’t solve it in a civilized manner. My goal is simple, and reasonable. I want to produce more or less identical plots in both PNG and PDF formats. PNG is a raster format. PDF is a vector format and also the Devil Incarnate. Sometimes you want one format, sometimes the other. Raster formats color in pixels on a grid of some fixed resolution. They are efficient when you need to plot a lot of elements, but you can’t zoom in on them without loss. When you make one, any as it were “structural” information about plot elements is lost. A line or a shape no longer exists as an editable line or shape. It’s just pixels. Vector formats can be easily resized up or down without loss of fidelity and keep more of the structural information used to make the plot to begin with. Lines and shapes remain lines and shapes. But vector formats get big real fast when you have a lot of objects to show, because each one is drawn separately. Also they are the Devil Incarnate. Especially when it comes to one special subset of lines and shapes: fonts.



DuckDuckGo

https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/02/06/kerning-and-kerning-in-a-widening-gyre

Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre

This post summarizes an extended period of deep annoyance. I have tried to solve the problem it describes more than once before and not quite done it. This has, in fact, happened again. I have still not satisfactorily solved the problem. But this time I know why I can’t solve it in a civilized manner. My goal is simple, and reasonable. I want to produce more or less identical plots in both PNG and PDF formats. PNG is a raster format. PDF is a vector format and also the Devil Incarnate. Sometimes you want one format, sometimes the other. Raster formats color in pixels on a grid of some fixed resolution. They are efficient when you need to plot a lot of elements, but you can’t zoom in on them without loss. When you make one, any as it were “structural” information about plot elements is lost. A line or a shape no longer exists as an editable line or shape. It’s just pixels. Vector formats can be easily resized up or down without loss of fidelity and keep more of the structural information used to make the plot to begin with. Lines and shapes remain lines and shapes. But vector formats get big real fast when you have a lot of objects to show, because each one is drawn separately. Also they are the Devil Incarnate. Especially when it comes to one special subset of lines and shapes: fonts.

  • General Meta Tags

    18
    • title
      Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre - kieranhealy.org
    • charset
      utf-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge,chrome=1
    • renderer
      webkit
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    6
    • og:url
      https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/02/06/kerning-and-kerning-in-a-widening-gyre/
    • og:site_name
      kieranhealy.org
    • og:title
      Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre
    • og:description
      This post summarizes an extended period of deep annoyance. I have tried to solve the problem it describes more than once before and not quite done it. This has, in fact, happened again. I have still not satisfactorily solved the problem. But this time I know why I can’t solve it in a civilized manner. My goal is simple, and reasonable. I want to produce more or less identical plots in both PNG and PDF formats. PNG is a raster format. PDF is a vector format and also the Devil Incarnate. Sometimes you want one format, sometimes the other. Raster formats color in pixels on a grid of some fixed resolution. They are efficient when you need to plot a lot of elements, but you can’t zoom in on them without loss. When you make one, any as it were “structural” information about plot elements is lost. A line or a shape no longer exists as an editable line or shape. It’s just pixels. Vector formats can be easily resized up or down without loss of fidelity and keep more of the structural information used to make the plot to begin with. Lines and shapes remain lines and shapes. But vector formats get big real fast when you have a lot of objects to show, because each one is drawn separately. Also they are the Devil Incarnate. Especially when it comes to one special subset of lines and shapes: fonts.
    • og:locale
      en
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    3
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:title
      Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre
    • twitter:description
      This post summarizes an extended period of deep annoyance. I have tried to solve the problem it describes more than once before and not quite done it. This has, in fact, happened again. I have still not satisfactorily solved the problem. But this time I know why I can’t solve it in a civilized manner. My goal is simple, and reasonable. I want to produce more or less identical plots in both PNG and PDF formats. PNG is a raster format. PDF is a vector format and also the Devil Incarnate. Sometimes you want one format, sometimes the other. Raster formats color in pixels on a grid of some fixed resolution. They are efficient when you need to plot a lot of elements, but you can’t zoom in on them without loss. When you make one, any as it were “structural” information about plot elements is lost. A line or a shape no longer exists as an editable line or shape. It’s just pixels. Vector formats can be easily resized up or down without loss of fidelity and keep more of the structural information used to make the plot to begin with. Lines and shapes remain lines and shapes. But vector formats get big real fast when you have a lot of objects to show, because each one is drawn separately. Also they are the Devil Incarnate. Especially when it comes to one special subset of lines and shapes: fonts.
  • Item Prop Meta Tags

    6
    • name
      Kerning and Kerning in a Widening Gyre
    • description
      This post summarizes an extended period of deep annoyance. I have tried to solve the problem it describes more than once before and not quite done it. This has, in fact, happened again. I have still not satisfactorily solved the problem. But this time I know why I can’t solve it in a civilized manner. My goal is simple, and reasonable. I want to produce more or less identical plots in both PNG and PDF formats. PNG is a raster format. PDF is a vector format and also the Devil Incarnate. Sometimes you want one format, sometimes the other. Raster formats color in pixels on a grid of some fixed resolution. They are efficient when you need to plot a lot of elements, but you can’t zoom in on them without loss. When you make one, any as it were “structural” information about plot elements is lost. A line or a shape no longer exists as an editable line or shape. It’s just pixels. Vector formats can be easily resized up or down without loss of fidelity and keep more of the structural information used to make the plot to begin with. Lines and shapes remain lines and shapes. But vector formats get big real fast when you have a lot of objects to show, because each one is drawn separately. Also they are the Devil Incarnate. Especially when it comes to one special subset of lines and shapes: fonts.
    • datePublished
      2025-02-06T20:32:42-05:00
    • dateModified
      2025-02-06T20:32:42-05:00
    • wordCount
      3561
  • Link Tags

    10
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://kieranhealy.org/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/02/06/kerning-and-kerning-in-a-widening-gyre/
    • icon
      https://kieranhealy.org/favicon-32x32.png
    • icon
      https://kieranhealy.org/favicon-16x16.png
    • manifest
      https://kieranhealy.org/manifest.json

Links

21