gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post

Preview meta tags from the gtonkinhill.github.io website.

Linked Hostnames

8

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post

Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses

Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.



Bing

Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses

https://gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post

Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.



DuckDuckGo

https://gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post

Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses

Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.

  • General Meta Tags

    8
    • title
      Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses -
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width,initial-scale=1
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • description
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    4
    • og:title
      Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses
    • og:description
      Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.
    • og:type
      article
    • og:url
      https://gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post/
  • Link Tags

    12
    • apple-touch-icon
      /apple-touch-icon.png
    • dns-prefetch
      //fonts.googleapis.com
    • dns-prefetch
      //fonts.gstatic.com
    • icon
      /favicon-32x32.png
    • preconnect
      https://fonts.gstatic.com

Links

19