gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post
Preview meta tags from the gtonkinhill.github.io website.
Linked Hostnames
8- 8 links togtonkinhill.github.io
- 3 links towww.biorxiv.org
- 2 links togithub.com
- 2 links towww.nature.com
- 1 link toacademic.oup.com
- 1 link todoi.org
- 1 link toscholar.google.com
- 1 link towww.science.org
Search Engine Appearance
Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses
Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.
Bing
Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses
Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.
DuckDuckGo
Supervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses
Update 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.
General Meta Tags
8- titleSupervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses -
- charsetUTF-8
- viewportwidth=device-width,initial-scale=1
- X-UA-CompatibleIE=edge
- description
Open Graph Meta Tags
4- og:titleSupervised normalisation can bias microbiome analyses
- og:descriptionUpdate 10/08/2023 Dr Sepich-Poore has raised some important points in an issue posted to GitHub here. I’d like to start by thanking Dr Sepich-Poore for highlighting these issues and providing constructive feedback. I also wish to emphasize that the analysis in my blog doesn’t definitively determine the presence or absence of a cancer-specific microbial signature in the TCGA data; rather, it emphasises the importance of normalisation in microbiome studies. The first important point raised by Dr Sepich-Poore, is that the use of Supervised Normalisation in the original TCGA paper did not include cancer type as the biological variable of interest.
- og:typearticle
- og:urlhttps://gtonkinhill.github.io/blog/tcga-post/
Link Tags
12- apple-touch-icon/apple-touch-icon.png
- dns-prefetch//fonts.googleapis.com
- dns-prefetch//fonts.gstatic.com
- icon/favicon-32x32.png
- preconnecthttps://fonts.gstatic.com
Links
19- https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/26/10/1308/193098
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz105
- https://github.com/gregpoore/tcga_rebuttal
- https://github.com/gtonkinhill/TCGA_analysis/issues/2
- https://gtonkinhill.github.io