doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15306609

Preview meta tags from the doi.org website.

Linked Hostnames

18

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15306609

Report on Challenges of Practical Reproducibility for Systems and HPC Computer Science

This report from the NSF-sponsored REPETO project synthesizes findings from the November 2024 Community Workshop on Practical Reproducibility in HPC, which convened researchers, artifact authors, reviewers, and chairs of reproducibility initiatives to address the critical challenge of making computational experiments reproducible in a cost-effective manner. The workshop deliberately focused on systems and HPC computer science research due to its unique requirements, including specialized hardware access and deep system reconfigurability. Through structured discussions, lightning talks, and panel sessions, participants identified key barriers to practical reproducibility and formulated actionable recommendations for the community. The report presents a dual framework of challenges and recommendations organized by target audience (authors, reviewers, organizations, and community). It characterizes technical obstacles in experiment packaging and review, including completeness of artifact descriptions, acquisition of specialized hardware, and establishing reproducibility conditions. The recommendations range from immediate practical tools (comprehensive checklists for artifact packaging) to ecosystem-level improvements (refining badge systems, creating artifact digital libraries, and developing AI-assisted environment creation). Rather than advocating for reproducibility regardless of cost, the report emphasizes striking an appropriate balance between reproducibility rigor and practical feasibility, positioning reproducibility as an integral component of scientific exploration rather than a burdensome afterthought. Appendices provide detailed, immediately actionable checklists for authors and reviewers to improve reproducibility practices across the HPC community. The workshop and report were supported by the NSF-sponsored REPETO project (award 2226406) and indirectly by the Chameleon project (NSF award 2027170). FOR COMMENTS: PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS ON THE REPORT TO [email protected]. FOR COMMENTS OR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHECKLIST, PLEASE SEE OUR GITHUB.



Bing

Report on Challenges of Practical Reproducibility for Systems and HPC Computer Science

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15306609

This report from the NSF-sponsored REPETO project synthesizes findings from the November 2024 Community Workshop on Practical Reproducibility in HPC, which convened researchers, artifact authors, reviewers, and chairs of reproducibility initiatives to address the critical challenge of making computational experiments reproducible in a cost-effective manner. The workshop deliberately focused on systems and HPC computer science research due to its unique requirements, including specialized hardware access and deep system reconfigurability. Through structured discussions, lightning talks, and panel sessions, participants identified key barriers to practical reproducibility and formulated actionable recommendations for the community. The report presents a dual framework of challenges and recommendations organized by target audience (authors, reviewers, organizations, and community). It characterizes technical obstacles in experiment packaging and review, including completeness of artifact descriptions, acquisition of specialized hardware, and establishing reproducibility conditions. The recommendations range from immediate practical tools (comprehensive checklists for artifact packaging) to ecosystem-level improvements (refining badge systems, creating artifact digital libraries, and developing AI-assisted environment creation). Rather than advocating for reproducibility regardless of cost, the report emphasizes striking an appropriate balance between reproducibility rigor and practical feasibility, positioning reproducibility as an integral component of scientific exploration rather than a burdensome afterthought. Appendices provide detailed, immediately actionable checklists for authors and reviewers to improve reproducibility practices across the HPC community. The workshop and report were supported by the NSF-sponsored REPETO project (award 2226406) and indirectly by the Chameleon project (NSF award 2027170). FOR COMMENTS: PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS ON THE REPORT TO [email protected]. FOR COMMENTS OR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHECKLIST, PLEASE SEE OUR GITHUB.



DuckDuckGo

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15306609

Report on Challenges of Practical Reproducibility for Systems and HPC Computer Science

This report from the NSF-sponsored REPETO project synthesizes findings from the November 2024 Community Workshop on Practical Reproducibility in HPC, which convened researchers, artifact authors, reviewers, and chairs of reproducibility initiatives to address the critical challenge of making computational experiments reproducible in a cost-effective manner. The workshop deliberately focused on systems and HPC computer science research due to its unique requirements, including specialized hardware access and deep system reconfigurability. Through structured discussions, lightning talks, and panel sessions, participants identified key barriers to practical reproducibility and formulated actionable recommendations for the community. The report presents a dual framework of challenges and recommendations organized by target audience (authors, reviewers, organizations, and community). It characterizes technical obstacles in experiment packaging and review, including completeness of artifact descriptions, acquisition of specialized hardware, and establishing reproducibility conditions. The recommendations range from immediate practical tools (comprehensive checklists for artifact packaging) to ecosystem-level improvements (refining badge systems, creating artifact digital libraries, and developing AI-assisted environment creation). Rather than advocating for reproducibility regardless of cost, the report emphasizes striking an appropriate balance between reproducibility rigor and practical feasibility, positioning reproducibility as an integral component of scientific exploration rather than a burdensome afterthought. Appendices provide detailed, immediately actionable checklists for authors and reviewers to improve reproducibility practices across the HPC community. The workshop and report were supported by the NSF-sponsored REPETO project (award 2226406) and indirectly by the Chameleon project (NSF award 2027170). FOR COMMENTS: PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS ON THE REPORT TO [email protected]. FOR COMMENTS OR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHECKLIST, PLEASE SEE OUR GITHUB.

  • General Meta Tags

    24
    • title
      Report on Challenges of Practical Reproducibility for Systems and HPC Computer Science
    • charset
      utf-8
    • X-UA-Compatible
      IE=edge
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1
    • google-site-verification
      5fPGCLllnWrvFxH9QWI0l1TadV7byeEvfPcyK2VkS_s
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    4
    • og:title
      Report on Challenges of Practical Reproducibility for Systems and HPC Computer Science
    • og:description
      This report from the NSF-sponsored REPETO project synthesizes findings from the November 2024 Community Workshop on Practical Reproducibility in HPC, which convened researchers, artifact authors, reviewers, and chairs of reproducibility initiatives to address the critical challenge of making computational experiments reproducible in a cost-effective manner. The workshop deliberately focused on systems and HPC computer science research due to its unique requirements, including specialized hardware access and deep system reconfigurability. Through structured discussions, lightning talks, and panel sessions, participants identified key barriers to practical reproducibility and formulated actionable recommendations for the community. The report presents a dual framework of challenges and recommendations organized by target audience (authors, reviewers, organizations, and community). It characterizes technical obstacles in experiment packaging and review, including completeness of artifact descriptions, acquisition of specialized hardware, and establishing reproducibility conditions. The recommendations range from immediate practical tools (comprehensive checklists for artifact packaging) to ecosystem-level improvements (refining badge systems, creating artifact digital libraries, and developing AI-assisted environment creation). Rather than advocating for reproducibility regardless of cost, the report emphasizes striking an appropriate balance between reproducibility rigor and practical feasibility, positioning reproducibility as an integral component of scientific exploration rather than a burdensome afterthought. Appendices provide detailed, immediately actionable checklists for authors and reviewers to improve reproducibility practices across the HPC community. The workshop and report were supported by the NSF-sponsored REPETO project (award 2226406) and indirectly by the Chameleon project (NSF award 2027170). FOR COMMENTS: PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS ON THE REPORT TO [email protected]. FOR COMMENTS OR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHECKLIST, PLEASE SEE OUR GITHUB.
    • og:url
      https://zenodo.org/records/15306610
    • og:site_name
      Zenodo
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    4
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:site
      @zenodo_org
    • twitter:title
      Report on Challenges of Practical Reproducibility for Systems and HPC Computer Science
    • twitter:description
      This report from the NSF-sponsored REPETO project synthesizes findings from the November 2024 Community Workshop on Practical Reproducibility in HPC, which convened researchers, artifact authors, reviewers, and chairs of reproducibility initiatives to address the critical challenge of making computational experiments reproducible in a cost-effective manner. The workshop deliberately focused on systems and HPC computer science research due to its unique requirements, including specialized hardware access and deep system reconfigurability. Through structured discussions, lightning talks, and panel sessions, participants identified key barriers to practical reproducibility and formulated actionable recommendations for the community. The report presents a dual framework of challenges and recommendations organized by target audience (authors, reviewers, organizations, and community). It characterizes technical obstacles in experiment packaging and review, including completeness of artifact descriptions, acquisition of specialized hardware, and establishing reproducibility conditions. The recommendations range from immediate practical tools (comprehensive checklists for artifact packaging) to ecosystem-level improvements (refining badge systems, creating artifact digital libraries, and developing AI-assisted environment creation). Rather than advocating for reproducibility regardless of cost, the report emphasizes striking an appropriate balance between reproducibility rigor and practical feasibility, positioning reproducibility as an integral component of scientific exploration rather than a burdensome afterthought. Appendices provide detailed, immediately actionable checklists for authors and reviewers to improve reproducibility practices across the HPC community. The workshop and report were supported by the NSF-sponsored REPETO project (award 2226406) and indirectly by the Chameleon project (NSF award 2027170). FOR COMMENTS: PLEASE SEND YOUR COMMENTS ON THE REPORT TO [email protected]. FOR COMMENTS OR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHECKLIST, PLEASE SEE OUR GITHUB.
  • Link Tags

    9
    • alternate
      https://zenodo.org/records/15306610/files/Reproducibility_Workshop_Report.pdf
    • apple-touch-icon
      /static/apple-touch-icon-120.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      /static/apple-touch-icon-152.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      /static/apple-touch-icon-167.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      /static/apple-touch-icon-180.png

Links

63