title

Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis | The European Journal of Health Economics

charset

UTF-8

X-UA-Compatible

IE=edge

applicable-device

pc,mobile

viewport

width=device-width, initial-scale=1

og:url

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10198-020-01217-5

og:type

article

og:site_name

SpringerLink

og:title

Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis - The European Journal of Health Economics

og:description

Background Health and care services are becoming increasingly strained and healthcare authorities worldwide are investing in integrated care in the hope of delivering higher-quality services while containing costs. The cost-effectiveness of integrated care, however, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to appraise current economic evaluations of integrated care and assesses the impact on outcomes and costs. Methods CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, Medline/PubMed, NHS EED, OECD Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and WHOLIS databases from inception to 31 December 2019 were searched to identify studies assessing the cost-effectiveness of integrated care. Study quality was assessed using an adapted CHEERS checklist and used as weight in a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate mean cost and mean outcomes of integrated care. Results Selected studies achieved a relatively low average quality score of 65.0% (± 18.7%). Overall meta-analyses from 34 studies showed a significant decrease in costs (0.94; CI 0.90–0.99) and a statistically significant improvement in outcomes (1.06; CI 1.05–1.08) associated with integrated care compared to the control. There is substantial heterogeneity in both costs and outcomes across subgroups. Results were significant in studies lasting over 12 months (12 studies), with both a decrease in cost (0.87; CI 0.80–0.94) and improvement in outcomes (1.15; 95% CI 1.11–1.18) for integrated care interventions; whereas, these associations were not significant in studies with follow-up less than a year. Conclusion Our findings suggest that integrated care is likely to reduce cost and improve outcome. However, existing evidence varies largely and is of moderate quality. Future economic evaluation should target methodological issues to aid policy decisions with more robust evidence on the cost-effectiveness of integrated care.

twitter:site

@SpringerLink

twitter:card

summary_large_image

twitter:image:alt

Content cover image

twitter:title

Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

twitter:description

The European Journal of Health Economics - Health and care services are becoming increasingly strained and healthcare authorities worldwide are investing in integrated care in the hope of...

position

1

position

2

position

3

apple-touch-icon

/oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/apple-touch-icon-92e819bf8a.png

canonical

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10198-020-01217-5

icon

/oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/android-chrome-192x192-6f081ca7e5.png

icon

/oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-32x32-1435da3e82.png

icon

/oscar-static/img/favicons/darwin/favicon-16x16-ed57f42bd2.png