
discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036
Preview meta tags from the discuss.python.org website.
Linked Hostnames
7- 23 links todiscuss.python.org
- 4 links togithub.com
- 2 links topeps.python.org
- 1 link todocs.python.org
- 1 link tomail.python.org
- 1 link topypi.org
- 1 link towww.discourse.org
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036
PEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system
I present PEP 702, which proposes to add an @typing.deprecated decorator that provides a way to communicate to static type checkers about deprecated functionality. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this proposal…
Bing
PEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036
I present PEP 702, which proposes to add an @typing.deprecated decorator that provides a way to communicate to static type checkers about deprecated functionality. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this proposal…
DuckDuckGo

PEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system
I present PEP 702, which proposes to add an @typing.deprecated decorator that provides a way to communicate to static type checkers about deprecated functionality. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this proposal…
General Meta Tags
9- titlePEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system - PEPs - Discussions on Python.org
- charsetutf-8
- descriptionI present PEP 702, which proposes to add an @typing.deprecated decorator that provides a way to communicate to static type checkers about deprecated functionality. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this proposal…
- generatorDiscourse 3.5.0.beta5-dev - https://github.com/discourse/discourse version 2a738620c45e7a0c9d650e0c0efdbe1ee18b6f19
- theme-color#fff
Open Graph Meta Tags
9- og:site_nameDiscussions on Python.org
- og:typewebsite
- og:imagehttps://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/python1/original/1X/f93ff97c4f381b5e8add5a0c163b4ded29f20ed7.png
- og:urlhttps://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036
- og:titlePEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system
Twitter Meta Tags
9- twitter:cardsummary
- twitter:imagehttps://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/python1/original/1X/f93ff97c4f381b5e8add5a0c163b4ded29f20ed7.png
- twitter:urlhttps://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036
- twitter:titlePEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system
- twitter:descriptionI present PEP 702, which proposes to add an @typing.deprecated decorator that provides a way to communicate to static type checkers about deprecated functionality. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this proposal. There is currently one open issue: Should the decorator raise a runtime warning? I propose that it should not, but there are some strong arguments for doing this. I would be interested to hear more opinions. Previous discussion is in typing-sig.
Item Prop Meta Tags
68- position1
- headlinePEP 702: Marking deprecations using the type system
- datePublished2023-01-22T14:24:52Z
- articleSectionPEPs
- keywords
Link Tags
39- alternate nofollowhttps://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036.rss
- apple-touch-iconhttps://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/python1/optimized/1X/4c06143de7870c35963b818b15b395092a434991_2_180x180.png
- canonicalhttps://discuss.python.org/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036
- iconhttps://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/python1/optimized/1X/9997f0605d56c4bfecd63594f52f42cdafd6b06a_2_32x32.png
- next/t/pep-702-marking-deprecations-using-the-type-system/23036?page=2
Links
33- https://discuss.python.org
- https://discuss.python.org/c/peps/19
- https://discuss.python.org/categories
- https://discuss.python.org/guidelines
- https://discuss.python.org/privacy