bugs.debian.org/311724

Preview meta tags from the bugs.debian.org website.

Linked Hostnames

7

  • General Meta Tags

    3
    • title
      #311724 - cdbs: Automatic update of debian/control, first paragraph, broken - Debian Bug report logs
    • Content-Type
      text/html;charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1

  • Link Tags

    3
    • canonical
      <a href="bugreport.cgi?bug=311724">311724</a>
    • icon
      /favicon.png
    • stylesheet
      /css/bugs.css

Emails

8
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]?body=On%20Fri%2C%2003%20Jun%202005%2000%3A08%3A01%20%2B0200%20Joerg%20Jaspert%20%3Cjoerg%40debian.org%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20Package%3A%20cdbs%0A%3E%20Version%3A%200.4.30%0A%3E%20Severity%3A%20normal%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Hi%20Maintainer%2C%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20First%20of%20it%3A%20Im%20%2Anot%2A%20after%20getting%20cdbs%20to%20die%20or%20something%20which%20I%0A%3E%20already%20heard%20from%20some%2C%20it%20is%20%2Athis%2A%20one%20mis-feature%20im%20against.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Im%20talking%20about%20the%20%22Update%20Build-Depends%20on%20the%20fly%22%20thing%20and%20the%20bad%0A%3E%20things%20that%20it%20produces.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Sorry%2C%20but%20Packages%20with%20such%20autogenerated%20build-dependencies%20should%0A%3E%20not%20go%20in%20our%20archive%2C%20for%20various%20reasons%2C%20the%20biggest%20one%20is%3A%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20-%20Modifying%20them%20on%20the%20fly%20can%20mean%20that%20they%20change%20without%20you%20noticing%0A%3E%20%20%20it.%20This%20is%20not%20bad%20for%20the%20actual%20built%20you%20do%2C%20but%20now%20think%20about%20later%0A%3E%20%20%20builds.%20Our%20autobuilders%20will%20get%20the%20changed%20Build-Dependencies%20and%20then%0A%3E%20%20%20may%20built%20a%20different%20thing.%0A%3E%20%20%20Or%20think%20about%20NMUs%20%28eg.%20for%20RC%20fixes%20and%20stuff%29%20or%20in%20worst%20case%20even%0A%3E%20%20%20security%20updates.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20A%20few%20examples%20of%20autogenerated%20Build-Dependencies%20which%20I%20found%20in%20NEW%0A%3E%20are%20%28trimmed%20for%20line-size%29%3A%0A%3E%201%3A%20debhelper%20%28%3E%3D4.2.0%29%2C%20cdbs%20%28%3E%3D0.4.23-1.1%29%2C%20build-essential%2C%0A%3E%20%20%20%20debhelper%20%28%3E%3D4.1.0%29%2C%20quilt%2C%20patchutils%20%28%3E%3D0.2.25%29%2C%0A%3E%20%20%20%20cdbs%20%28%3E%3D0.4.27-1%29%2C%20python-dev%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20Note%3A%20I%20havent%20doubled%20the%20debhelper%20or%20cdbs%20ones%2C%20they%20ARE%20this%20way.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%202%3A%20cdbs%20%28%3E%3D%200.4.23-1.1%29%2C%20build-essential%2C%20debhelper%20%28%3E%3D%204.1.0%29%2C%0A%3E%20%20%20%20patchutils%20%28%3E%3D%200.2.25%29%0A%3E%20%20%20Note%3A%20Here%20it%20is%20mainly%20b-e%20-%20maybe%20related%20to%20an%20older%20bug%20in%20cdbs%2C%0A%3E%20%20%20%20but%20still%20an%20example.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20I%20could%20paste%20more%2C%20but%20would%20make%20mail%20unneccessary%20long.%20%3A%29%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20A%20solution%20to%20this%20thing%20is%20simple%3A%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20Add%20another%20target%20in%20the%20cdbs%20thing%2C%20that%20is%20%2Anever%2A%20called%20automaic%0A%3E%20%20%20in%20the%20build-process%2C%20only%20if%20the%20maintainer%20runs%20it%20with%20debian%2Frules%0A%3E%20%20%20target%20and%20let%20that%20one%20do%20the%20update%20thingie.%20Of%20course%20maintainer%0A%3E%20%20%20needs%20to%20look%20if%20it%20is%20correct%20then.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20The%20only%20exception%20from%20modifying%20something%20in%20the%20first%20paragraph%20of%0A%3E%20debian%2Fcontrol%20is%20the%20uploaders%20field%2C%20as%20it%20would%20be%20insane%20for%20some%20big%0A%3E%20group-maintained%20package%20to%20do%20that%20by%20hand%2C%20but%20thats%20it.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20--%20%0A%3E%20bye%20Joerg%0A%3E%20%22That%27s%20just%20f%2A%2A%2Aing%20great%2C%20now%20the%20bar%20for%20being%20a%20cool%20guy%20in%20free%0A%3E%20software%20just%20got%20raised.%20It%20used%20to%20be%20you%20just%20had%20to%20write%20a%20million%0A%3E%20lines%20of%20useful%20code.%20Now%20you%27ve%20got%20to%20get%20a%20subpoena%20from%20SCO%20to%20be%20cool.%22%0A&In-Reply-To=%3C877jhcbef2.fsf%40vorlon.ganneff.de%3E&subject=Re%3A%20cdbs%3A%20Automatic%20update%20of%20debian%2Fcontrol%2C%20first%20paragraph%2C%20broken&References=%3C877jhcbef2.fsf%40vorlon.ganneff.de%3E
  • [email protected]?body=On%20Wed%2C%208%20Jun%202005%2017%3A15%3A12%20%2B0200%20Martin%20Quinson%20%3Cmartin.quinson%40loria.fr%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20On%20Fri%2C%20Jun%2003%2C%202005%20at%2012%3A08%3A01AM%20%2B0200%2C%20Joerg%20Jaspert%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Im%20talking%20about%20the%20%22Update%20Build-Depends%20on%20the%20fly%22%20thing%20and%20the%20bad%0A%3E%20%3E%20things%20that%20it%20produces.%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Sorry%2C%20but%20Packages%20with%20such%20autogenerated%20build-dependencies%20should%0A%3E%20%3E%20not%20go%20in%20our%20archive%2C%20for%20various%20reasons%2C%20the%20biggest%20one%20is%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20-%20Modifying%20them%20on%20the%20fly%20can%20mean%20that%20they%20change%20without%20you%20noticing%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20it.%20This%20is%20not%20bad%20for%20the%20actual%20built%20you%20do%2C%20but%20now%20think%20about%20later%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20builds.%20Our%20autobuilders%20will%20get%20the%20changed%20Build-Dependencies%20and%20then%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20may%20built%20a%20different%20thing.%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20Or%20think%20about%20NMUs%20%28eg.%20for%20RC%20fixes%20and%20stuff%29%20or%20in%20worst%20case%20even%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20security%20updates.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20I%20am%20playing%20with%20the%20idea%20of%20having%20cdbs%20ensuring%20that%20the%20human%20provided%0A%3E%20dependencies%20are%20enough.%20I%20mean%2C%20if%20cdbs%20various%20part%20say%20that%20we%20need%20this%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%201%3A%20debhelper%20%28%3E%3D4.2.0%29%2C%20cdbs%20%28%3E%3D0.4.23-1.1%29%2C%20build-essential%2C%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20%20debhelper%20%28%3E%3D4.1.0%29%2C%20quilt%2C%20patchutils%20%28%3E%3D0.2.25%29%2C%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20%20cdbs%20%28%3E%3D0.4.27-1%29%2C%20python-dev%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20then%20make%20sure%20that%20the%20build%20dependencies%20hand-written%20in%20the%20control%20file%0A%3E%20ensure%20at%20least%20%0A%3E%20debhelper%20%28%3E%3D4.2.0%29%2C%20cdbs%20%28%3E%3D0.4.27-1%29%2C%20quilt%2C%20patchutils%20%28%3E%3D0.2.25%29%2C%20python-dev%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Ie%2C%20that%20the%20set%20of%20human%20provided%20build-dependencies%20encompass%20the%20script%0A%3E%20demanded%20ones.%20Would%20it%20be%20ok%20for%20you%20to%20stop%20the%20compilation%20process%20if%0A%3E%20it%27s%20not%20the%20case%20%28ie%2C%20if%20the%20human%20forgot%20one%20build-dep%2C%20according%20to%20the%0A%3E%20scripts%29%2C%20or%20would%20you%20consider%20this%20as%20just%20another%20form%20of%20the%20pure%20evil%0A%3E%20you%20are%20talking%20in%20your%20mail%3F%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Anyway%2C%20I%27m%20struggling%20with%20implementations%20issue%20here%20and%20don%27t%20plan%20to%20do%0A%3E%20anything%20before%20a%20while.%20Of%20course%2C%20I%20could%20do%20a%20little%20perl%20script%0A%3E%20somewhere%20under%20%2Fusr%2Flib%20doing%20the%20verification%2C%20but%20I%20was%20kind%20of%20wondering%0A%3E%20if%20such%20thing%20already%20exists%20in%20dpkg%20or%20apt%20or%20not...%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Bye%2C%20Mt.%0A&subject=Re%3A%20%5BBuild-common-hackers%5D%20Bug%23311724%3A%20cdbs%3A%20Automatic%20update%20of%20debian%2Fcontrol%2C%20first%20paragraph%2C%20broken&References=%3C877jhcbef2.fsf%40vorlon.ganneff.de%3E%0A%20%3C20050608151512.GB4773%40papagos%3E&In-Reply-To=%3C20050608151512.GB4773%40papagos%3E
  • [email protected]?References=%3C877jhcbef2.fsf%40vorlon.ganneff.de%3E%20%3C20050608151512.GB4773%40papagos%3E%0A%20%3C20050723103940.GA23499%40lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de%3E&subject=Re%3A%20Re%3A%20%5BBuild-common-hackers%5D%20Bug%23311724%3A%20cdbs%3A%20Automatic%20update%20of%20debian%2Fcontrol%2C%20first%20paragraph%2C%20broken&In-Reply-To=%3C20050723103940.GA23499%40lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de%3E&body=On%20Sat%2C%2023%20Jul%202005%2012%3A39%3A40%20%2B0200%20Marc%20Haber%20%3Cmh%2Bdebian-packages%40zugschlus.de%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20On%20Wed%2C%20Jun%2008%2C%202005%20at%2005%3A15%3A12PM%20%2B0200%2C%20Martin%20Quinson%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20Anyway%2C%20I%27m%20struggling%20with%20implementations%20issue%20here%20and%20don%27t%20plan%20to%20do%0A%3E%20%3E%20anything%20before%20a%20while.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20In%20the%20meantime%2C%20I%27d%20really%20appreciate%20a%20short%20HOWTO%20giving%20directions%0A%3E%20how%20to%20invoke%20the%20auto-update%20process%20from%20a%20dedicated%20target%20so%20that%0A%3E%20DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL%20can%20be%20removed%20from%20my%20debian%2Frules%0A%3E%20files%20while%20still%20having%20the%20automatic%20process%20available%20for%20manual%0A%3E%20invocation.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Greetings%0A%3E%20Marc%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20--%20%0A%3E%20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------%0A%3E%20Marc%20Haber%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%7C%20%22I%20don%27t%20trust%20Computers.%20They%20%7C%20Mailadresse%20im%20Header%0A%3E%20Mannheim%2C%20Germany%20%20%7C%20%20lose%20things.%22%20%20%20%20Winona%20Ryder%20%7C%20Fon%3A%20%2A49%20621%2072739834%0A%3E%20Nordisch%20by%20Nature%20%7C%20%20How%20to%20make%20an%20American%20Quilt%20%7C%20Fax%3A%20%2A49%20621%2072739835%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A
  • [email protected]?body=On%20Thu%2C%2004%20Aug%202005%2001%3A15%3A24%20%2B0100%20Sam%20Morris%20%3Csam%40robots.org.uk%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20This%20does%20the%20trick%3A%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20fakeroot%20debian%2Frules%20debian%2Fcontrol%20DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL%3A%3Dyes%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20--%20%0A%3E%20Sam%20Morris%0A%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Frobots.org.uk%2F%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20PGP%20key%20id%205EA01078%0A%3E%203412%20EA18%201277%20354B%20991B%20%20C869%20B219%207FDB%205EA0%201078%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A&References=%3C42F15E1C.5020504%40robots.org.uk%3E&subject=Re%3A%20Manual%20invocation%20of%20the%20rule%20to%20regenerate%20debian%2Fcontrol&In-Reply-To=%3C42F15E1C.5020504%40robots.org.uk%3E

Links

8