bugs.debian.org/300683

Preview meta tags from the bugs.debian.org website.

Linked Hostnames

3

  • General Meta Tags

    3
    • title
      #300683 - Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way - Debian Bug report logs
    • Content-Type
      text/html;charset=utf-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1

  • Link Tags

    3
    • canonical
      <a href="bugreport.cgi?bug=300683">300683</a>
    • icon
      /favicon.png
    • stylesheet
      /css/bugs.css

Emails

8
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]?In-Reply-To=%3C20050321040655.GB10445%40wolffelaar.nl%3E&body=On%20Mon%2C%2021%20Mar%202005%2005%3A06%3A55%20%2B0100%20Jeroen%20van%20Wolffelaar%20%3Cjeroen%40wolffelaar.nl%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20Package%3A%20oprofile-source%0A%3E%20Severity%3A%20serious%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20The%20way%20this%20package%20is%20built%20is%20not%20accepteble.%20Please%20fix%20the%20build%0A%3E%20system%20to%20something%20that%20works%20with%20just%20dpkg-buildpackage.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20--Jeroen%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20-----%20Forwarded%20message%20from%20Martin%20Schulze%20%3Cjoey%40infodrom.org%3E%20-----%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Date%3A%20Wed%2C%2019%20Jan%202005%2012%3A41%3A43%20%2B0100%0A%3E%20From%3A%20Martin%20Schulze%20%3Cjoey%40infodrom.org%3E%0A%3E%20To%3A%20242068%40bugs.debian.org%0A%3E%20Subject%3A%20Explanation%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Michael%20Banck%3A%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20The%20package%20builds%20fine%20like%20that%2C%20it%27s%20just%20the%20additional%20kernel%0A%3E%20%20%20modules%20which%20need%20to%20be%20built%20by%20a%20different%20script%2C%20AIUI%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Steve%20Langasek%3A%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20well%2C%20here%27s%20the%20thing.%20%20the%20source%20package%20does%20build%20if%20you%20run%0A%3E%20%20%20the%20normal%20debian%2Frules%20commands%3B%20but%20those%20binary%20packages%20that%20are%0A%3E%20%20%20built%20do%20%2Anot%2A%20include%20the%20kernel-specific%20modules%20packages.%20%20So%20you%0A%3E%20%20%20have%20to%20go%20through%20an%20additional%20step%20to%20build%20the%20per-kernel%20module%0A%3E%20%20%20packages%2C%20which%20are%20not%20listed%20in%20debian%2Fcontrol%20but%20are%20present%20in%0A%3E%20%20%20the%20archive.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20me%3A%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20We%20cannot%20support%20this%20security-wise.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20Apart%20from%20that%20the%20package%20apparently%20fails%20to%20build%20from%20source%0A%3E%20%20%20%28FTBFS%29%20if%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20%20%20make%20-f%20debian%2Frules%20build%0A%3E%20%20%20%20%20sudo%20make%20-f%20debian%2Frules%20binary%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20doesn%27t%20produce%20all%20required%20binary%20packages%20that%20should%20end%20up%20in%0A%3E%20%20%20the%20archive.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%20%20This%20is%20surely%20release-critical.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Regards%2C%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%09Joey%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20-----%20End%20forwarded%20message%20-----%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20--%20%0A%3E%20Jeroen%20van%20Wolffelaar%0A%3E%20jeroen%40wolffelaar.nl%0A%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Fjeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A&subject=Re%3A%20Package%20Fails%20to%20build%20from%20Source%20in%20a%20sane%20way&References=%3C20050321040655.GB10445%40wolffelaar.nl%3E
  • [email protected]?body=On%20Mon%2C%2021%20Mar%202005%2013%3A25%3A47%20-0700%20Al%20Stone%20%3Cahs3%40fc.hp.com%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20On%20Mon%2C%202005-03-21%20at%2005%3A06%20%2B0100%2C%20Jeroen%20van%20Wolffelaar%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20Package%3A%20oprofile-source%0A%3E%20%3E%20Severity%3A%20serious%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20The%20way%20this%20package%20is%20built%20is%20not%20accepteble.%20Please%20fix%20the%20build%0A%3E%20%3E%20system%20to%20something%20that%20works%20with%20just%20dpkg-buildpackage.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20I%27m%20a%20little%20puzzled.%20%20The%20package%20%27oprofile-source%27%20does%20build%0A%3E%20from%20source%20using%20dpkg-buildpackage.%20%20I%20just%20now%20built%20a%20brand%20new%0A%3E%20sid%20chroot%20for%20i386%2C%20and%20ran%20%27dpkg-buildpackage%27%20without%20a%20problem%0A%3E%20%28after%20adding%20build-essential%20and%20the%20build-deps%29.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Perhaps%20it%20is%20not%20clear%20from%20the%20description%2C%20but%20this%20package%20is%0A%3E%20only%20supposed%20to%20provide%20the%20_source_%20needed%20to%20build%20an%20oprofile%0A%3E%20kernel%20module%20for%202.4.x%20kernels.%20%20It%20is%20not%20supposed%20to%20provide%0A%3E%20the%20modules%20themselves.%20%20Hence%2C%20I%20build%20the%20module%20packages%20personally%0A%3E%20and%20upload%20them%20as%20a%20convenience%20for%20using%2C%20using%20the%20source%20provided%0A%3E%20in%20%27oprofile-source.%27%20%20Is%20it%20this%20module%20building%20part%20that%20you%27re%0A%3E%20suggesting%20I%20automate%3F%20%20If%20it%20is%2C%20that%27s%20fine%20--%20I%20just%20want%20to%20make%0A%3E%20sure%20I%20understand%20what%20part%20is%20unacceptable.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20If%20there%27s%20a%20better%20way%20to%20do%20this%2C%20let%20me%20know.%20%20This%20is%20the%20method%0A%3E%20that%20my%20AM%20and%20I%20settled%20on%20when%20I%20applied%20to%20become%20a%20DD.%20%20The%0A%3E%20problem%20is%20that%20the%20oprofile%20module%20was%20not%20accepted%20into%20the%20upstream%0A%3E%20Linux%20kernel%20source%20until%202.6.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Note%20that%20this%20is%20not%20an%20issue%20for%202.6.x%20kernels%20where%20the%20kernel%0A%3E%20image%20packages%20contain%20an%20oprofile%20module%20by%20default.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20--Jeroen%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20-----%20Forwarded%20message%20from%20Martin%20Schulze%20%3Cjoey%40infodrom.org%3E%20-----%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Date%3A%20Wed%2C%2019%20Jan%202005%2012%3A41%3A43%20%2B0100%0A%3E%20%3E%20From%3A%20Martin%20Schulze%20%3Cjoey%40infodrom.org%3E%0A%3E%20%3E%20To%3A%20242068%40bugs.debian.org%0A%3E%20%3E%20Subject%3A%20Explanation%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Michael%20Banck%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20The%20package%20builds%20fine%20like%20that%2C%20it%27s%20just%20the%20additional%20kernel%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20modules%20which%20need%20to%20be%20built%20by%20a%20different%20script%2C%20AIUI%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Steve%20Langasek%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20well%2C%20here%27s%20the%20thing.%20%20the%20source%20package%20does%20build%20if%20you%20run%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20the%20normal%20debian%2Frules%20commands%3B%20but%20those%20binary%20packages%20that%20are%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20built%20do%20%2Anot%2A%20include%20the%20kernel-specific%20modules%20packages.%20%20So%20you%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20have%20to%20go%20through%20an%20additional%20step%20to%20build%20the%20per-kernel%20module%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20packages%2C%20which%20are%20not%20listed%20in%20debian%2Fcontrol%20but%20are%20present%20in%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20the%20archive.%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20me%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20We%20cannot%20support%20this%20security-wise.%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20Apart%20from%20that%20the%20package%20apparently%20fails%20to%20build%20from%20source%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20%28FTBFS%29%20if%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20%20%20%20%20make%20-f%20debian%2Frules%20build%0A&subject=Re%3A%20Bug%23300683%3A%20Package%20Fails%20to%20build%20from%20Source%20in%20a%20sane%20way&References=%3C20050321040655.GB10445%40wolffelaar.nl%3E%0A%20%3C1111436747.5165.28.camel%40fcboson.fc.hp.com%3E&In-Reply-To=%3C1111436747.5165.28.camel%40fcboson.fc.hp.com%3E
  • [email protected]?body=On%20Mon%2C%2021%20Mar%202005%2015%3A02%3A25%20-0800%20Steve%20Langasek%20%3Cvorlon%40debian.org%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20Hi%20Al%2C%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20On%20Mon%2C%20Mar%2021%2C%202005%20at%2001%3A25%3A47PM%20-0700%2C%20Al%20Stone%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20I%27m%20a%20little%20puzzled.%20%20The%20package%20%27oprofile-source%27%20does%20build%0A%3E%20%3E%20from%20source%20using%20dpkg-buildpackage.%20%20I%20just%20now%20built%20a%20brand%20new%0A%3E%20%3E%20sid%20chroot%20for%20i386%2C%20and%20ran%20%27dpkg-buildpackage%27%20without%20a%20problem%0A%3E%20%3E%20%28after%20adding%20build-essential%20and%20the%20build-deps%29.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Perhaps%20it%20is%20not%20clear%20from%20the%20description%2C%20but%20this%20package%20is%0A%3E%20%3E%20only%20supposed%20to%20provide%20the%20_source_%20needed%20to%20build%20an%20oprofile%0A%3E%20%3E%20kernel%20module%20for%202.4.x%20kernels.%20%20It%20is%20not%20supposed%20to%20provide%0A%3E%20%3E%20the%20modules%20themselves.%20%20Hence%2C%20I%20build%20the%20module%20packages%20personally%0A%3E%20%3E%20and%20upload%20them%20as%20a%20convenience%20for%20using%2C%20using%20the%20source%20provided%0A%3E%20%3E%20in%20%27oprofile-source.%27%20%20Is%20it%20this%20module%20building%20part%20that%20you%27re%0A%3E%20%3E%20suggesting%20I%20automate%3F%20%20If%20it%20is%2C%20that%27s%20fine%20--%20I%20just%20want%20to%20make%0A%3E%20%3E%20sure%20I%20understand%20what%20part%20is%20unacceptable.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Yes%2C%20the%20problem%20is%20this%20second%20part%2C%20which%20results%20in%20binary%20packages%20in%0A%3E%20the%20archive%20that%20are%20not%20built%20as%20a%20result%20of%20.%2Fdebian%2Frules%20binary.%20%20This%0A%3E%20is%20non-standard%2C%20and%20in%20particular%20complicates%20the%20matter%20of%20security%0A%3E%20support%20post-release.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20If%20these%20are%20merely%20convenience%20packages%20that%20nothing%20depends%20on%2C%20it%20may%20be%0A%3E%20best%20to%20remove%20them%20from%20the%20archive%20and%20just%20ship%20the%20oprofile-source%0A%3E%20package.%20%20If%20so%2C%20please%20reassign%20this%20bug%20to%20ftp.debian.org.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Cheers%2C%0A%3E%20--%20%0A%3E%20Steve%20Langasek%0A%3E%20postmodern%20programmer%0A&References=%3C20050321040655.GB10445%40wolffelaar.nl%3E%20%3C1111436747.5165.28.camel%40fcboson.fc.hp.com%3E%0A%20%3C20050321230221.GA4964%40mauritius.dodds.net%3E&subject=Re%3A%20Bug%23300683%3A%20Package%20Fails%20to%20build%20from%20Source%20in%20a%20sane%20way&In-Reply-To=%3C20050321230221.GA4964%40mauritius.dodds.net%3E
  • [email protected]?In-Reply-To=%3C1111451913.5165.74.camel%40fcboson.fc.hp.com%3E&body=On%20Mon%2C%2021%20Mar%202005%2017%3A38%3A33%20-0700%20Al%20Stone%20%3Cahs3%40fc.hp.com%3E%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20On%20Mon%2C%202005-03-21%20at%2015%3A02%20-0800%2C%20Steve%20Langasek%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20On%20Mon%2C%20Mar%2021%2C%202005%20at%2001%3A25%3A47PM%20-0700%2C%20Al%20Stone%20wrote%3A%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20Perhaps%20it%20is%20not%20clear%20from%20the%20description%2C%20but%20this%20package%20is%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20only%20supposed%20to%20provide%20the%20_source_%20needed%20to%20build%20an%20oprofile%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20kernel%20module%20for%202.4.x%20kernels.%20%20It%20is%20not%20supposed%20to%20provide%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20the%20modules%20themselves.%20%20Hence%2C%20I%20build%20the%20module%20packages%20personally%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20and%20upload%20them%20as%20a%20convenience%20for%20using%2C%20using%20the%20source%20provided%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20in%20%27oprofile-source.%27%20%20Is%20it%20this%20module%20building%20part%20that%20you%27re%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20suggesting%20I%20automate%3F%20%20If%20it%20is%2C%20that%27s%20fine%20--%20I%20just%20want%20to%20make%0A%3E%20%3E%20%3E%20sure%20I%20understand%20what%20part%20is%20unacceptable.%0A%3E%20%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20Yes%2C%20the%20problem%20is%20this%20second%20part%2C%20which%20results%20in%20binary%20packages%20in%0A%3E%20%3E%20the%20archive%20that%20are%20not%20built%20as%20a%20result%20of%20.%2Fdebian%2Frules%20binary.%20%20This%0A%3E%20%3E%20is%20non-standard%2C%20and%20in%20particular%20complicates%20the%20matter%20of%20security%0A%3E%20%3E%20support%20post-release.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Okay%2C%20that%20makes%20sense.%20%20Thanks.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%3E%20If%20these%20are%20merely%20convenience%20packages%20that%20nothing%20depends%20on%2C%20it%20may%20be%0A%3E%20%3E%20best%20to%20remove%20them%20from%20the%20archive%20and%20just%20ship%20the%20oprofile-source%0A%3E%20%3E%20package.%20%20If%20so%2C%20please%20reassign%20this%20bug%20to%20ftp.debian.org.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20Hmmm.%20%20%22Convenience%22%20is%20an%20interesting%20term.%20%20Without%20a%20kernel%20module%0A%3E%20produced%20from%20the%20source%20contained%20in%20%27oprofile-source%27%2C%20systems%0A%3E%20with%202.%5B24%5D.x%20kernels%20will%20not%20be%20able%20to%20run%20the%20user-space%20tools%0A%3E%20in%20the%20package%20%27oprofile%27%20%282.6%20kernels%20will%20not%20have%20this%20problem%29.%0A%3E%20However%2C%20because%20%27oprofile%27%20cannot%20determine%20which%20kernel%20will%20be%0A%3E%20in%20use%20when%20it%20is%20run%2C%20we%20decided%20not%20to%20force%20a%20%22Depends%3A%22%20on%20a%0A%3E%20%27kernel-oprofile-module%27%20in%20the%20package%20so%20the%20user%20has%20greater%0A%3E%20flexibility.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20So%2C%20I%20need%20an%20opinion%2C%20I%20guess%3A%20is%20it%20reasonable%20to%20make%20the%20user%0A%3E%20create%20their%20own%20kernel%20modules%20in%20those%20cases%3F%20%20If%20they%20are%20using%0A%3E%20something%20like%20%27oprofile%2C%27%20they%20had%20better%20know%20what%20they%27re%20doing%2C%0A%3E%20so%20that%27s%20not%20unreasonable%2C%20but%20it%20might%20be%20inconvenient%2C%20and%20it%0A%3E%20affects%20a%20%28possibly%20large%29%20subset%20of%20all%20possible%20users.%20%20If%20it%27s%0A%3E%20not%20reasonable%2C%20I%27ll%20leave%20this%20bug%20as%20is%20and%20put%20together%20the%20proper%0A%3E%20packaging%20to%20build%20all%20the%20various%20modules%20from%20source.%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20--%20%0A%3E%20Ciao%2C%0A%3E%20al%0A%3E%20----------------------------------------------------------------------%0A%3E%20Al%20Stone%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Alter%20Ego%3A%0A%3E%20Linux%20%26%20Open%20Source%20Lab%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Debian%20Developer%0A%3E%20Hewlett-Packard%20Company%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.debian.org%0A%3E%20E-mail%3A%20ahs3%40fc.hp.com%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20ahs3%40debian.org%0A%3E%20----------------------------------------------------------------------%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A%3E%20%0A&subject=Re%3A%20Bug%23300683%3A%20Package%20Fails%20to%20build%20from%20Source%20in%20a%20sane%20way&References=%3C20050321040655.GB10445%40wolffelaar.nl%3E%0A%09%20%3C1111436747.5165.28.camel%40fcboson.fc.hp.com%3E%0A%09%20%3C20050321230221.GA4964%40mauritius.dodds.net%3E%0A%20%3C1111451913.5165.74.camel%40fcboson.fc.hp.com%3E

Links

6