blog.gceasy.io/2016/08/15/questioning-status-quo-serial-gc-not-for-serious-applications

Preview meta tags from the blog.gceasy.io website.

Linked Hostnames

16

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://blog.gceasy.io/2016/08/15/questioning-status-quo-serial-gc-not-for-serious-applications

QUESTIONING STATUS QUO - 'SERIAL GC NOT FOR SERIOUS APPLICATIONS'

This study challenges the notion that Serial GC is unsuitable for serious applications by comparing it to G1 GC in a real production environment. Results showed comparable throughput and better latency for Serial GC. The findings suggest that with careful tuning, Serial GC can perform effectively in production settings, questioning established beliefs.



Bing

QUESTIONING STATUS QUO - 'SERIAL GC NOT FOR SERIOUS APPLICATIONS'

https://blog.gceasy.io/2016/08/15/questioning-status-quo-serial-gc-not-for-serious-applications

This study challenges the notion that Serial GC is unsuitable for serious applications by comparing it to G1 GC in a real production environment. Results showed comparable throughput and better latency for Serial GC. The findings suggest that with careful tuning, Serial GC can perform effectively in production settings, questioning established beliefs.



DuckDuckGo

https://blog.gceasy.io/2016/08/15/questioning-status-quo-serial-gc-not-for-serious-applications

QUESTIONING STATUS QUO - 'SERIAL GC NOT FOR SERIOUS APPLICATIONS'

This study challenges the notion that Serial GC is unsuitable for serious applications by comparing it to G1 GC in a real production environment. Results showed comparable throughput and better latency for Serial GC. The findings suggest that with careful tuning, Serial GC can perform effectively in production settings, questioning established beliefs.

  • General Meta Tags

    11
    • title
      QUESTIONING STATUS QUO - 'SERIAL GC NOT FOR SERIOUS APPLICATIONS' - GC easy - Universal Java GC Log Analyser
    • charset
      UTF-8
    • viewport
      width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0
    • robots
      index, follow, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1, max-video-preview:-1
    • google-site-verification
      17aOkYkZubNd_cHzd-PlRkKyltvDDgH9Oogt15HWUZU
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    10
    • US country flagog:locale
      en_US
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      QUESTIONING STATUS QUO - 'SERIAL GC NOT FOR SERIOUS APPLICATIONS'
    • og:description
      This study challenges the notion that Serial GC is unsuitable for serious applications by comparing it to G1 GC in a real production environment. Results showed comparable throughput and better latency for Serial GC. The findings suggest that with careful tuning, Serial GC can perform effectively in production settings, questioning established beliefs.
    • og:url
      https://blog.gceasy.io/questioning-status-quo-serial-gc-not-for-serious-applications/
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    5
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Written by
    • twitter:data1
      GCeasy Team
    • twitter:label2
      Est. reading time
    • twitter:data2
      4 minutes
  • Link Tags

    55
    • EditURI
      https://blog.gceasy.io/xmlrpc.php?rsd
    • alternate
      https://blog.gceasy.io/feed/
    • alternate
      https://blog.gceasy.io/comments/feed/
    • alternate
      https://blog.gceasy.io/questioning-status-quo-serial-gc-not-for-serious-applications/feed/
    • alternate
      https://blog.gceasy.io/wp-json/wp/v2/posts/1410

Links

61