Better proof reading of articles prior to decision making · Atlas Obscura Digital Product Feedback

I know that the team is only small but I feel that articles aren't getting read properly prior to a decision is made on whether an article is published or not. For example, I have recently had an artificial rejected for been a duplicate. However the article I submitted is a different place, at a different address, with a different history, amd a different name. The only similarity it had to the article it was supposed to be repeating was it was in the same city! A similar thing happened with another article I previously submitted, because it had a similar name to an article half way around the world it was rejected. I understand that things will be busy for you, but it feels like articles are been skim read rayher than actually reviewed before decisions are made, otherwise the differences with my article would have been identified. This is disappointing because I can only imagine all the other amazing places that are falsely getting rejected!